Where the communists roam?
Just got back from a wonderful trip to Montana. We went for a few days for a family wedding. I love hanging out with hubby Pete’s family. Other than his nephew and his husband trying to give us alcohol poisoning, we had a blast (actually, the alcohol poisoning was fun too, but I have to give them s**t for it). Pete’s family is fun, welcoming, and truly generous.
While we were there we took a trip over the Beartooth Mountains to Cooke City, Montana.

The scenery is breathtaking. As is the altitude. We both fought panic attacks from the lack of oxygen, and neither of us slept very well that night. The food was nothing special, and the drive back through parts of Wyoming was not nearly as pretty…

but I think this was one of our better vacations.
The tool party we came back to (to build a doghouse for the soon-to-be newly weds puppy), the rehearsal dinner, the wedding, and the reception, were warm, inviting, and fun. This is a group of people whom I always look forward to seeing again. Every family has drama, but this one is so large, none of it is of much import. They are all deeply religious, but in a very real, non fundamental way. I would be happy with any one of them deciding the course of this country.
I would bet that at least 99% of them support the “public” option.
Now, who are these communists (or more accurately, socialists, artistic license with the title)? Almost every person you see in the photo below (and above)!
Most of them have no idea, but we all are. These people are enjoying, and I bet 99% of them would vote to protect, “public” lands. A national forest is a public project, just like the “public” option. Would any of them vote to eliminate medicare, public schools (well, at least 60%), post office, “public” works? I could actually go on for quite a bit, “public” libraries for instance. Come on, get over it already democrats. We need to be demanding at least a public option! In a few years these nut jobs are all going to be proven wrong. Again! I’m not even going to list the religious rights failures. And just so you don’t get me wrong. Unlike my ex-wife Laurie, I am not an atheist. I consider myself a true Christian, though I truly think I would fall in most people’s category of Agnostic.
Laurie will be sad to hear this, but Pete’s family inspires me more and more to follow Christ’s teachings. If he existed, which I don’t really care about, he taught only about love and forgiveness. Pete’s family lives it. They are not only welcoming, but celebratory, of my and Pete’s marriage, and our young nephews B and T. But I also believe that Laurie could be absolutely, 100% right. She usually is, and her arguments are always eye-opening. But I’m human, and I doubt. So I just try to live correctly.
I don’t think of the religious right as “christians”, I think of them as Bible-ists. True Christians follow the teachings of Christ. A prophet, maybe a real man, maybe the son of God, maybe completely myth. Whatever I truly think of him, I follow his teachings, much as I follow the teachings of Buddha, and a few other ethicists. The average evangelical, follows the teachings of the bible. They don’t truly ever sit and think about what Jesus would do, they are too concerned with what the old testament, or Paul, or Peter would do. So even if I don’t have the faith they do, I have the honesty of my convictions. Based on logic. And love. “Do unto others as you would have them do unto you”, said Jesus. That’s not religion, that’s not faith, that’s the golden rule. That’s the “public” option.
Laurie, by the way, is one of the truly finest Americans I’ve ever met. I might be able to say “the”, but I always doubt there’s not someone else up there with her, like her mother, or Pete. She’s much more passionate about individual rights, and common sense laws, than I. I trust her as much as I trust Pete’s siblings.



